Public supposition of a linear and exalting trend in art developing, which takes commonly roots from enlightenment tenets in representation, based on pictorial classic patterns and educated supposition of development, inclined to non-classical and non-representative art which clearly depends on post-Hegelian and post-romantic and modern attitudes, both, due to tight concerns of traditional European reflection, are unable to plan contexts leading to a creative art process. This paper, by representing a third tenet to «Progress» in art and «development» of art which basically strengthen by criticizing of two millennium of the history of thought in western culture, tend to show that a creative tenet of art development, cannot come true by employing the common categories. We discuss that, only through a fundamental criticism of traditional philosophical categories, which has consistently claimed of a guardianship to almost all human activities including art, tending to a constant restriction to plurality, creativeness, freedom … it will be possible to access to a hopeful development of creative art.